No doubt any reader of this post will be familiar with a whole lot of negative publicity regarding the disorderly student behaviour in the weekend associated with the Undie 500. The Undie is an annual car rally organised by Canterbury University's ENSOC, where cars are traditionally purchased for less than $500, decorated, and driven down to Dunedin by students (via a lengthy pub crawl) for a weekend of partying and catching up with mates.
The first time I heard of the trouble associated with the Undie was in 2007. I was travelling in Europe and came across news of arrests, bottle throwing and student riots on an international news website. I remember being slightly confused at the time as I thought that the students were protesting something (in the mould of Springbok tour or Vietnam protests) and couldn't work out what that something was. However it turns out there is nothing actually being protested, which leads to the question - why is there rioting which requires the police to forcibly intervene?
On Friday night I wandered down Castle St at about midnight to check out what was going on. There were several hundred students gathered there drinking, and although no trouble was being caused, there were also a large number of police present. There also seemed to be a tangible expectation that things would eventually end up the way they have in the past couple of years, with arrests and student versus police conflict. In my view this expectation of trouble on both sides is self-fulfilling, and as such is a large part of the problem. Students were there because police were there, and police were there because students were there. Press coverage of the events is invariable negative, portrays the situation as militant and therefore contributes to the same events occuring over and over. In an article on stuff.co.nz, student crowds are referred to as 'mobs', the area of flats in North Dunedin as a 'student stronghold', and there is a suggestion from the mayor Peter Chin that Canterbury students 'trash their own city instead'. With these expectations in place, as soon as crowd numbers become to large it is hard for the police to continue to stand aside, especially when students bait them by lighting couches on fire in the street and throwing the odd bottle. It's worth pointing out I have only ever seen a burning couch in Dunedin on Undie weekend, which I think shows that it is also a case of fulfillment of a pre-conceived expectation of what the night should entail, rather than normal student behaviour.
When the crowd began to chant "scarfies on the piss" on Friday night I went home in disgust, and would like to reassure readers that people involved in such antics aren't an accurate representation of the wider student population. The riot police later stepped in (I could hear their megaphones as I lay in bed) and from that point, with liberal use of batons and pepper spray on anyone who doesn't get off the street and inside a flat fast enough - the police are suddenly perceived as opponents and are resented even more.
So as soon as force is used the game is up and the whole event descends into chaos. The challenge for ENSOC, our own OUSA, police officers and local authorities has been to prevent things from getting to that stage. Suggestions of a concert to give students something to do were nearly made a reality but, if Canterbury students and OUSA President Ed Darlow are to be believed, fell through due to Chin's insistence on putting his head in the sand and refusing to find a solution.
At the end of the day, the mayor can say he wants Undie 500 banned all he likes, but nothing in the law can prevent motorists travelling from Christchurch to Dunedin. It is up to all parties involved to address the underlying issues and, in my view, to remove the self-fulfilling expectation that there will be trouble. Otago University has an excellent academic reputation, particularly as a research institution, and it is time that events such as those over the weekend stopped bringing this into jeopardy.